“It just tastes flat.”
That was Rena’s honest opinion of how the third bottle of our second brew, a Sierra Nevada Celebration Ale clone, fared on her palate.
Unfortunately, she was right.
Something’s not quite right with Brownlee Brood #2, and the not knowing exactly what is what makes homebrewing so frustrating (and challenging … and fun). I don’t know enough yet to put my finger on a specific reason for the ale’s failure(s), so there’s a good chance the next batch will be flawed, too. Adding to the befuddlement is the fact that this beer’s fruition was much different than our first fermentation. This recipe required test-tube yeast, where the first was a smack-pack; it asked for Irish moss and maltodextrin, where the first needed neither. Our preparation was smoother and our boiling cleaner for this brew. The bottling was much easier, and without serious mistakes.
So where did we go wrong? What mistake resulted in a beer that tastes nothing like, my tongue-muscle memory tells me, Sierra Nevada’s consistently extremely tasty hoppy brew? (For that matter, how does a dry-hopped beer end up with no nose whatsoever? How does one avoid chill haze?) Don’t know. Think it might be too little bottling sugar, but that’s a not-completely-educated guess. We’re planning a “vertical” tasting of Brood #2 and its superior, original twin, which will no doubt highlight the shortcomings of our liquid. The Celebration bomber awaits in the fridge. I’m not thrilled to set up the inevitably lopsided comparison, but my perfectionist streak demands it.
Brood #2 isn’t all that bad, though. It has a very nice, lingering hop finish. A pleasant amber hue, albeit hazy. And a decidedly smooth mouthfeel. (Thanks, maltodextrin!) It evidences a brewing team short on experience, but not without some competence. It certainly doesn’t taste bad.
And then there are beers that don’t beg justification and the halfhearted mumbling of their positive characteristics. Beers that stand as easy testament to their creators’ talents and honed skills. Beers that live up to the intentions sweated into their being and the labels on their labels.
Pyramid Breweries’ new spring seasonal, Outburst Imperial IPA, is such a beer. It lives up to its style, perhaps eclipsing it in its lively clarity and lack of typical heavy sweetness. Some IIPAs take the IBU-balancing thing so far that you’re essentially drinking bitter, alcoholic honey. I worship hops, but I’ll pass on that thick resin. (Think Widmer’s Deadlift.) No, Outburst is clean and bright, extremely hoppy but with the appropriate thinness of a great pale. Here’s how the Pyramid folks describe it:
A crafty combination of four different hops [Nugget, Chinook, Centennial, Simcoe] along with a dose of dry-hopping powers Outburst to 80 IBU strong. Its bold profile offers an aroma reminiscent of the Northwest hop fields at harvest time, along with spicy overtones of fresh citrus. Seeking a harmonious balance to the hop overload, four different specialty malts are blended to create a distinctive deep amber hue, and sweet caramel and roasty flavors.
Outburst was officially unveiled at the Seattle Pyramid Alehouse last month (and is presumably still available there), so maybe you’ve had it from the tap. Better yet, though, is that the excellent brew is available this month and next, likely at your local grocery store or bottle shop, in 12 oz doses. (Yes, the label is as graphically unappealing as the others from Pyramid, its recent rebranding not such as success, in my book.)
You’ll like it. And you won’t have to think long on why. It’s good. It tastes as its style dictates, if not even better than what you’d expect.
Brownlee Brood #2? Well, it goes down just as easily, but not as justifiably. Perhaps in brewing #3 we’ll get things right. Righter, anyway.










